repobrain review¶

Analyze the blast radius and risk score of a pull request.

Usage¶

repobrain review <PR_NUMBER_OR_BRANCH> [OPTIONS]

Options¶

Option	Default	Description
`--format`	`table`	Output format: `table`, `json`, `markdown`
`--max-depth N`	`3`	Transitive dependency traversal depth
`--no-transitive`	—	Only show direct changed files

Output¶

PR #42 — Add user authentication

DIRECT FILES (3)
  src/auth/login.py          risk: 8.2  centrality: 0.71  owner: alice@co.com
  src/auth/tokens.py         risk: 7.4  centrality: 0.65  owner: alice@co.com
  src/models/user.py         risk: 6.1  centrality: 0.58  owner: bob@co.com

TRANSITIVE DEPENDENTS (12)
  src/api/endpoints.py       risk: 5.3  (imports src/auth/login.py)
  src/tests/test_login.py    risk: 2.1  (imports src/auth/login.py)
  ...

CO-CHANGE WARNINGS
  src/auth/middleware.py is historically changed with src/auth/login.py (72% co-change)
  — but is NOT in this PR. Review recommended.

RECOMMENDED REVIEWERS
  alice@co.com  (owns 2/3 direct files)
  bob@co.com    (owns 1/3 direct files, 8/12 transitive files)

OVERALL RISK SCORE: 7.8 / 10.0  [HIGH]

Risk Score Formula¶

risk = centrality × temporal_hotspot × (1 + test_gap_score)

Normalized to 0–10 across the repository.